worship-god-christian-background

During my studies in the area of Christian apologetics and philosophy, I came across what I consider to be a wonderful tool for grounding youth in a Christian worldview—it is William Lane Craig and Joseph Tang’s course, “The Defense Never Rests.” (See the Store section at: www.reasonablefaith.org to order) The course was put together by Joseph Tang (Australia) for his Sunday school class (ages 8 and above) and is based on Dr. Craig’s work in the area of apologetics, philosophy, arguments for the existence of God, etc.—in other words, preparing youth at an early age to understand and defend the Christian worldview so as to meet the cultural challenges that they will face throughout their life. A Christian worldview has been defined as: “A worldview is like a lens through which you see things, and you’re not really aware of the lens, you’re only aware of the things you see…so it becomes the glasses, the spectacles, the filter through which they’re actually seeing life and the whole universe and the world and human life is understood through that lens… Nobody is without a worldview. The only question is, is it a good one, or a bad one…On the basis of your world view, you make your momentary judgments in life, so everyone has a world view and I think it is the grind that forms the nature of reality for you and the judgments that you make for yourself and others in your life.” (See the following YouTube video-“What Is Worldview?” for a more in depth synopsis of the Christian worldview— http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Txez9sJUtaE)

I have been working through the course with my 10 year-old grandson and he really enjoys the classes and always looks forward to the next one as they are very intellectually and spiritually stimulating. (I also supplement the classes with YouTube clips of Dr. Craig’s and other prominent philosophers and apologists’ lectures, debates, etc.) From our conversations during the classes, I can tell that there are some gaps in his understanding of theology, as what would be expected at his age, and even some foundational pillars which the course is helping to bridge, build up and fill in. I would highly recommend the course to all parents who have children in the 8-13 age range regardless of their educational milieu—public, private or home schooling. To teach the course effectively, the teacher will need to be familiar with Dr. Craig’s book, “Reasonable Faith,” (also found at: www.reasonablefaith.org) as this is what the course is based on. This is certainly a plus for the parent/teacher as in the course of teaching the child, the parent and/or teacher is also taking the course which will be a strength to them as well. “Reasonable Faith” is a tremendous book and is basically a summary of all that one needs to know regarding Christian apologetics/philosophy.

In the introduction of Dr. Craig’s book, “Reasonable Faith”, he states the following, “In high school and college Christian teenagers are intellectually assaulted with every manner of non-Christian worldview coupled with an overwhelming relativism. If parents are not intellectually engaged with their faith and do not have sound arguments of Christian theism and good answers to their children’s questions, then we are in real danger of losing our youth. It’s no longer enough to teach our children Bible stories; they need doctrine and apologetics.” The goal and purpose of “The Defense Never Rests” course is to get a jump on the ‘intellectual assault’ at an early age, before the child enters the higher grades where the assault intensifies.

Also I was listening to a new podcast from Dr. Craig this morning—”Important International Influences”—and he mentioned something that I thought was very interesting in regards to the organization “Focus on the Family” and how they are now expanding their focus to included apologetics as they see the need for their youth membership to be more equipped in meeting the challenge that secular society, and more specifically, the naturalist, atheist and scientism ideologies that are so prevalent in today’s world. Their new program is called, “True You.” Dr. Craig will be one of the guest apologists that they will be filming for the course. Here’s the blurb from Craig about the program: “They have sensed the need of intellectual engagement with our culture and with worldview thinking, so they are sponsoring projects like this “True You” project…[which is based on] interviews with scholars and address the pertinent issues today in regards to the Christian faith.”

He finished his podcast with this revealing testimony as to how the Christian worldview in the West is waning and the need for Christians to be actively and intellectually engaged in order to have an impact on the society in which they live: “It’s unfortunate when organizations have to be reactive rather than proactive. Recently at our church, I heard a representative from the Southern Baptist Convention talking about statistical analysis of various generations with regard to the Christian faith. What he shared, if we really took it seriously we would be absolutely horrified and in despair. He said, among the baby-boomer generation, about 65% claim to be Christians. In the generation after that, the gen-x generation, he said, that drops to 20 some percent, I forget the exact figures. Then the millenials, the young people today in their early 20’s, it’s about 8%. Now if these statistics are really accurate and hold up, it means that we are literally watching before our very eyes, the de-Christianization of the United States. We will become like Europe in another generation and to me that is just horrifying. It is clear that the churches have not been proactive in commending the faith intellectually to their people. So the incursions of secularism and the new atheism have gone largely unchecked. I think finally people are waking up to the need to give an answer of the hope that is in us. I just pray that it hasn’t come too late.”

creation2

Of late, I have been researching the theological, as well as philosophical premise and/or foundation for creatio ex nihilo, my main resource being the excellent book by Paul Copan and William Lane Craig entitled, Creation Out of Nothing—A Biblical, Philosophical, and Scientific Exploration. (Go to Resource Store to order) Although creation ex nihilo may not seem to fall within the category of arguments for the existence of God, I see it as an important tenant of the Christian faith and one that must be understood if ones Christian worldview is to be founded on a firm foundation that is “steadfast and immovable.” (1 Corinth. 15:58)

As a clarification and defining of creation ex nihilo I once again turn to the book mentioned in the previous paragraph: “So when one describes what creation out of nothing means, we affirm that without God’s initiating creation, only God exists. Upon creation, we have a universe because God willed it into finite, temporal being. Thus, creation out of nothing affirms that the universe is contingent on God, not just in having its (continued) existence in being (ontological dependence) but also in having its temporal origination from nothing preexistent, but simply by the will and world of God (ex nihilo).”

My focus in this brief article is in regards to the early Christian church—referring here to the first, second and third centuries—and that of the early Church fathers understanding and firmly held belief in the biblical tenant of creatio ex nihilo. Sadly, the biblical tenant of creation ex nihilo, has by some, been relegated to a second century formulation by early Christian theologians. As Copan and Craig state, “One German theologian, Gerhard May, in what has become a standard work on the doctrine of creation ex nihilo in early Christian thought, claims that this doctrine is biblically ambiguous and was a late second century formulation by Christian theologians in responding to Middle Platonic and Gnostic ideas. He suggests that the doctrine of creation out of nothing is “not demanded by the test of the Bible.” Unfortunately, May proffers little substantiation for this claim, and many who cite him simply take it on his authority that creation out of nothing is “not demanded by the text of the Bible”…his comment is regrettable and misleading. James Noel Hubler (following May’s work at many points) declares that creation ex nihilo not only “appeared suddenly in the latter half of the second century CE” but also “lacked precedent”: This doctrine was “an innovation in the interpretive traditions of revelation and cannot be explained merely as a continuation of tradition.” This, we shall see, is not simply overstated; it is plainly false.”[1]

During my recent study time, I have been working my way through the book, The Early Christians in Their Own Words, by Eberhard Arnold. I was struck by the fact that almost every early church writer was a proponent of creation ex nihilo. I am including here a few of the excerpts from this book to emphasize the prominence that the early Christians place on God’s sovereignty and omnipotence.

It is the Christians, O emperor, who have sought and found the truth. We have realized it from their writings; they are closer to the truth and to a right understanding than all the other peoples, for they acknowledge God. They believe in him, the creator and builder of the universe, in whom all things are and from whom everything comes. Aristides, Apology 15,16; ca. A.D. 137.

When we are together, we remind one another of these things, and help all who suffer want the best we can, and keep together in harmony. We praise the creator of the universe through His Son Jesus Christ, and through the Holy Spirit for everything we receive.—Justin, First Apology, 67

It is the Christians, O emperor, who have sought and found the truth. We have realized it from their writings; they are closer to the truth and to a right understanding than all the other peoples, for they acknowledge God. They believe in him, the creator and builder of the universe, in whom all things are and from whom everything comes.—Aristides, Apology 15, 16; ca, AD 137

There is one rule of faith: this is the belief [testified to in the following]. There is one and absolutely only one God and no other than the creator of the universe, who, through his own Word sent down before all other things, brought into being everything out of nothing…We believe as we have always done – and even more now since we have been better instructed by the representative advocate, who truly leads men into all truth – we believe that there is only one true God, namely in that administration of his household which we call “economy,” that there is only one son of the one and only God, who is his own Word, who proceeded from him, through whom everything was made and without whom nothing was made…–Tertullian, On Shows 4; The Prescriptions of Heretics 20, 13; against Praxeus 2; Concerning the Veiling of Virgins 1

We think of God the creator of all things as being far above all that is corruptible. Justin, First Apology 20.

I have shown sufficiently that we are not atheists, for ours is the one God, uncreated and eternal, invisible, immutable, incomprehensible, inconceivable, to be grasped only by the mind and by reason, surrounded by light and beauty, by Spirit and power to an ineffable degree: he by whose word the universe was created, was set in order, and is ruled.–Athenagoras, A Plea Regarding Christians 10.

We think of God the creator of all things as being far above all that is corruptible. Justin, First Apology 20.

Is it right, I ask, to charge us with atheism, we who clearly distinguish God from matter and prove that matter is something quite different from God and that there is a tremendous distance between them? We show that the divine being is uncreated and eternal, to be grasped only by mind and spirit. Matter on the other hand is created and corruptible. Athenagoras, A Plea Regarding Christians 4.

The sacrifice most pleasing to him is that we try to recognize who stretched out and vaulted the heavens and set the earth as the center, who gathered the water into seas and separated light from darkness, who adorned the ether with stars and made the earth bring forth all manner of seed, who called the animals into being and created man. If we follow God as the molder who holds all things together and watches over all things with that same wisdom and skill with which he governs the universe, and if we lift up holy hands to him, what need does he have then of ritual sacrifices?

Beautiful indeed is the world, glorious in its magnitude, in the arrangement of the stars, both in the zodiac and around the constellation of the Great Dipper and in its form as a sphere. Yet the world for these reasons does not deserve to be worshipped; rather does its sublime artificer…God himself is everything: unapproachable light! Perfect beauty! Spirit! Power! Word! If the world were a well-tuned instrument played in rhythm, I would not worship the instrument but him who made it and tuned it, who strikes the notes and sings the song that fits the melody. God is the perfect good and eternally does only good. Athenagoras, A Plea Regarding Christians 13, 16.


[1] Copan and Craig, Creation Out of Nothing, Intro pg 11, Baker Academic, 2004