• Home
facebook
twitter
google_plus
email
  • ABOUT
  • ARGUMENTS – EXISTENCE OF GOD
    • The Argument from Contingency
    • Cosmological Argument
    • Moral Argument
    • Ontological Argument
    • Teleological/Design/Fine-tuning Argument
    • Pascal’s Wager
    • The Argument from Religious Experience
    • The Argument from Miracles
    • The Argument from Consciousness
    • The Argument from Truth
    • The Argument from Desire
    • The Argument from Aesthetic Experience
  • HISTORICITY – RESURRECTION
    • Minimal facts argument
    • The Trials
    • Historicity of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ
    • Burial
    • Empty Tomb
    • Postmortem appearance
    • Origin of the disciples belief
    • Reliability of the New Testament
    • Skeptics see the light
  • CHRISTIANITY & ISLAM
    • Fundamental Differences
    • Trinity vs Tawhid
    • Jesus
    • The Bible, Quran and Torah-Comparative Studies
    • Evangelism to Muslims
  • APOLOGETICS
    • What is apologetics?
    • Worldviews
    • Can anyone be an apologist?
    • Being a Christian “case-maker”
    • Apologetic Resources

Pascal’s Wager

The Argument from Pascal’s Wager–by Peter Kreeft
blaiseMost philosophers think Pascal’s Wager is the weakest of all arguments for believing in the existence of God. Pascal thought it was the strongest. After finishing the argument in his Pensées, he wrote, “This is conclusive, and if men are capable of any truth, this is it.” That is the only time Pascal ever wrote a sentence like that, for he was one of the most sceptical philosophers who ever wrote.

Suppose someone terribly precious to you lay dying, and the doctor offered to try a new “miracle drug” that he could not guarantee but that seemed to have a 50-50 chance of saving your beloved friend’s life. Would it be reasonable to try it, even if it cost a little money? And suppose it were free—wouldn’t it be utterly reasonable to try it and unreasonable not to?

Suppose you hear reports that your house is on fire and your children are inside. You do not know whether the reports are true or false. What is the reasonable thing to do—to ignore them or to take the time to run home or at least phone home just in case the reports are true?

Suppose a winning sweepstakes ticket is worth a million dollars, and there are only two tickets left. You know that one of them is the winning ticket, while the other is worth nothing, and you are allowed to buy only one of the two tickets, at random. Would it be a good investment to spend a dollar on the good chance of winning a million?

No reasonable person can be or ever is in doubt in such cases. But deciding whether to believe in God is a case like these, argues Pascal. It is therefore the height of folly not to “bet” on God, even if you have no certainty, no proof, no guarantee that your bet will win. (For complete article, here)

Pascal’s Wager–William Lane Craig

I discuss Pascal’s Wager in the chapter on “Religious Epistemology” in Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview. For those who are not familiar with Pascal’s argument, let me summarize briefly. Pascal argued, in effect, that belief in God is pragmatically justified because we have nothing to lose and everything to gain from holding that belief. (For complete article, here)

Have You Misunderstood Pascal’s Wager?–Tim Keller & Ravi Zacharias

A Royal Ruin: Pascal’s Argument from Humanity to Christianity–Douglas Groothuis
Is it possible to reconcile mankind’s dueling capacities for debauchery and greatness? As Dr. Doug Groothuis explains, Pascal saw the Christian worldview as the only plausible explanation for this inner conflict that plagues the human race. (For complete article, here)


Featured Articles

Contagious Faith-Discover Your Natural Style for Sharing Jesus with Others
Jun 05, 2023
Christmas and the Muslim—Building the Bridge to Christ
Dec 01, 2022
PERSON OF INTEREST-Why Jesus Matters, by J. Warner Wallace
Aug 20, 2021
Prayer and Evangelism—the Two-pronged Model of the Great Commission
May 21, 2021
Omnipotence, impossibility, self-contradiction, and dealing with nonsense
Mar 03, 2021
The Problem of Evil, Suffering and Death—Making sense of the 'why'?
May 06, 2020
God's megaphone to rouse a deaf world—C. S. Lewis
Mar 30, 2020
Ahmadiyya Muslims-the incoherence of an 'ahistorical' worldview-Part 2
Feb 28, 2020