By Jerry Root, Christianity Today-June 14, 2018

Many Christians talk about Christian apologetics. Indeed, the topic is very interesting for Christians on many levels as we seek to gain confidence and assurance for our own faith. And, of course, apologetics also has great value for us as we seek to help seekers and doubters to get over the intellectual barriers keeping them from embracing faith in Christ.

But often, there is one great apologetic that gets neglected, and this concerns God’s love, forgiveness, and willingness to be Lord of our lives.

A brief look at apologetics

First, however, let me define and clarify terms. Apologia in classical times simply meant “defense”. In a court of law, an apologetic was the making of a defense for the defendant at trial. Such was the case of the Apology by Plato. He was setting forth the case made by Socrates during his trial before the court at Athens.

In Acts 7, Stephen makes a defense before his accusers in Jerusalem. And several times in the book of Acts, Paul sets out a defense before his accusers, not only for his actions as he traveled the world preaching the gospel, but also a defense for the gospel itself. He wanted people to see the reasonableness for faith in Christ.

Paul would reference the prophetic passages of the Old Testament and showed how Jesus, in the days of the Incarnation, was the exact fulfillment of these prophecies. Furthermore, Paul appeals to the historicity of the resurrection of Christ from the dead, and the remarkable number of eyewitnesses who validated having seen the Resurrected Christ.

These were apologetic proofs for faith. Jesus was not only raised from the dead, but his resurrection validated both his deity and his message—somehow the death and Resurrection of Christ puts us right with God. Paul used apologetics to validate his message that Christ’s sacrifice is the means whereby God forgives sin, reconciles lost humanity to himself, and provides the hope of eternal life.

For complete article, here

NEW ORLEANS (BP) -– Apologetics experts from across the nation took the stage at Defend ’19, New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary’s weeklong apologetics conference, Jan. 7-11.

“Christians have always needed to be able to state what they believe clearly and to defend their faith when asked to give a reason for the hope that they have in Christ,” said Robert Stewart, Defend director. “But today in our postmodern, post-Christian, post-truth culture it is especially important that we be winsome ambassadors for Christ who share the truth in love in the power of God’s Spirit.”

Plenary speakers included Frank Turek, coauthor of “I Don’t have Enough Faith to be an Atheist” and Chris Brooks, pastor and radio host of “Equipped with Chris Brooks.”

Turek, president of CrossExamined.org, told the 350 attendees that the truth of the Christian faith centers on four questions: Does truth exist? Does God exist? Are miracles possible? Is the New Testament true? If the answer is “yes” to each question, then the Christian faith must be true, he stated.

Regarding the existence of truth, Turek said, “If there is no truth, then Christianity can’t be true. Of course, if there is no truth, atheism can’t be true, either.”

Going further, Turek noted that people more often reject God for emotional reasons than for lack of evidence.

“Most people are not looking for the truth, they’re running from it,” he said. “But the only way to find happiness is straight through truth. Jesus is truth.” (For complete article, here)

As Christians, we need to be equipped to fulfill our responsibilities and duty in carrying out the Great Commission that our Lord and Savior gave to us at the time of His ascension. His parting words were, “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.” (Acts 1:8-ESV) An essential aspect of our witness is being able to articulate an historical case for the historicity and credibility of the Christian faith and worldview. (1 Peter 3:15)

Historian Mark A. Noll sums up why history ought to matter to us as Christians:

The Christian stake in history is immense. Every aspect of lived Christianity—worship, sacraments, daily godliness, private devotion, religiously inspired benevolence, preaching—every major theme of Christian theology—the nature of God in relation to the world, the meaning of Christ, the character of salvation, the fate of the universe—directly or indirectly involves questions about how the present relates to the past.[1]

 
Jewish historian Will Herberg places history front and center in the defense of the biblical faith:

The uniqueness—the “scandal”—of biblical faith is revealed in its radically historical character… The message biblical faith proclaims, the judgments it pronounces, the salvation it promises, the teaching it communicates, are all defined historically and understood as historical realities, rather than timeless structures of ideas or values.[2]

 
As it has been rightly said, Christianity stands or falls on history, the historical events in which God’s entered into the history of this world at different times and different places. Paul makes this crystal clear in 1 Cor. 15 when he boldly states, “And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. If in Christ we have hope in this life only, we are of all people most to be pitied. But in fact Christ has been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep…”

It is the historical resurrection event on which the Christian faith stands or falls, and it is the historical event that is most often attacked and as such, is the one that every Christian must be able to defend, not just by saying, “I know that Jesus lives because He lives in my heart.” The self-authenticating witness of the Holy Spirit is an evidence of Christ’s presence for the believer, but for the unbeliever it is essential that we as the believer are equipped to present objective evidence in support of our beliefs. Otherwise our claims hold no more water than the assertions of anyone else claiming to have a private experience of God. Peter is very clear on this point when he says, “… but in your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect…” (1 Peter 3:15-ESV)

So what is the argument we are told to prepare in making the defense for the reason of our hope and belief? It is the evidential/historical proof of the Christian worldview. This was the evidential methodology that Jesus and His disciples used when making their case. Here are just a few of many examples:

The disciples of John reported all these things to him. And John, calling two of his disciples to him, sent them to the Lord, saying, “Are you the one who is to come, or shall we look for another?” And when the men had come to him, they said, “John the Baptist has sent us to you, saying, ‘Are you the one who is to come, or shall we look for another?’” In that hour he healed many people of diseases and plagues and evil spirits, and on many who were blind he bestowed sight. And he answered them, “Go and tell John what you have seen and heard: the blind receive their sight, the lame walk, lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, the poor have good news preached to them. And blessed is the one who is not offended by me.” (Luke 7:18-23-ESV)

That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we looked upon and have touched with our hands, concerning the word of life—the life was made manifest, and we have seen it, and testify to it and proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and was made manifest to us—that which we have seen and heard we proclaim also to you, so that you too may have fellowship with us; and indeed our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ. (1 John 1:1-3-ESV)

For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty. For when he received honor and glory from God the Father, and the voice was borne to him by the Majestic Glory, “This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased,” we ourselves heard this very voice borne from heaven, for we were with him on the holy mountain. (2 Peter 1:16-18-ESV)

In an interview on the challenge of history as it pertains to Christianity, William Lane Craig offers the following:

Why is history so important to the Christian faith?

History is crucial to Christianity because it keeps the Christian faith from degenerating into mythology. Unless the Bible is rooted in actual historical events, there is no reason to think that Jesus of Nazareth should be any more determinative for my life today than so-called gods like Thor, Odin or Zeus or any other mythological deity. History is the vital component in Christianity because it grounds faith in fact and keeps it from being mere myth.

Do other religions have a similar interest in history?

Yes, but only in a relative sense. Other religions certainly have an historical component. One thinks of Judaism, for example, where at least among orthodox Jews, God’s acts in history like the Exodus are very important. God’s rescue of the Israelites from Egypt is the central miracle of the Old Testament. Again, history plays some role in Islam. For instance, the coming down of the Qur’an out of heaven to Muhammad is purported to be an historical event and is believed by Muslims to be God’s revelation to him.

So there are historical elements in these faiths, but they don’t have the same significance as historical events in Christianity. The reason for this is that one’s salvation in Judaism and in Islam is not a matter of historical facts; it’s a matter of being obedient to certain sorts of prescribed activities or regulations. Although these regulations arose in a certain historical context, that context doesn’t really affect the practice of the piety of those religions in any way. However, in Christianity it’s entirely different. In Christianity the saving acts of God are themselves historical acts. So if you were to remove the historicity of Jesus or the historicity of the cross, the whole basis for atonement and salvation would be removed.

So, in one sense, it’s true that history is important to these other faiths; but historical facts do not occupy the central role that the saving acts of God do in Christianity.[3]

As per William Lane Craig’s analysis regarding Islam and history, a number of Muslim scholars have affirmed that the Qur’an, Islam’s highest authority, is not a book of history. I have had this confirmed again and again by imams whom I have conversed with. Islamic scholar, Hamza Yusuf says this about the Qur’an and history:

“The Qur’an is not a history book. There are definitely historical elements in there, the Qur’an is using historical examples, but they are used in an a-historical placing. In other words, the story of Pharoah and Musa is irrelevant when it occurred, it’s even irrelevant if it occurred. What is being taught is something very powerful. The Quranic narrative is that it did occur, but that is not what is relevant from the story. The story is used as a teaching example to learn something of what happened in the past in order to avoid its repetition in the future.” [4] (For more on Islam and the Qur’an’s detachment from history, see my article, “The Qur’an & history-do they sync?” here)

 
Theologian and author Graham A. Cole sums up the importance that history should occupy in the faith of the believer:

“God is rendered in Scripture not as some kind of explanatory principle cited to make sense of the natural world. The God of the Bible is not like the idea of water in Thales, the ancient Greek philosopher. For Thales, water was the key to understanding nature. Rather the God of Scripture is the living God who creates, speaks, saves and judges. Broadly speaking, sensitivity to the historic dimension of Scripture is not an option. It is inescapable if justice is to be done to the Bible’s own content.[5]

 
Daniel L. Migliore therefore rightly argues, “If the Gospels refer to the living God acting and suffering in Christ for our salvation, if the story they tell is not simply pious fiction, then historical study can never be irrelevant for Christian faith.”[6]

References
[1] Mark A. Noll, “History,” in Dictionary for the Theological Interpretation of the Bible, Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2005, pg. 295
[2] Will Herberg, Biblical Faith as Heilsgeschichte, the Christian Scholars Review
[3] William Lane Craig, The Challenge of History: An Interview with William Lane Craig (Australian Presbyterian), http://www.reasonablefaith.org/the-challenge-of-history-an-interview-with-william-lane-craig#ixzz4qVzICmb1
[4] Hamza Yusuf, The Qur’an is Not a History Book, from lecture found here
[5] Graham A. Cole, The peril of a “historyless” systematic theology, Chapter 2-Do Historical Matters Matter to Faith, ed. James K. Hoffmeir, 2012, pg. 57
[6] Daniel L. Migliore, Faith Seeking Understanding: An Introduction to Christian Theology, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004, pg. 53

Resources
What Criteria Do Historians Use to Get to the Minimal Facts About the Historical Jesus?-by Wintery Knight, here
FREE E-book-Evidence for the Historical Jesus-Is the Jesus of History the Christ of Faith?-by Gary Habermas, here

Is the Bible historically reliable-Frank Turek-One-minute Apologist

The Evidence for Christianity-William Lane Craig

Top 10 Archaeological Discoveries that Authenticate the Bible

For information about the conference, registration, etc., click here

For more information click here

I have had the privilege during the last couple months to present a pro-evangelism message to two different audiences here in Canada where my wife and I reside. One presentation was at an event that was specifically organized for my presentation, and another as the Sunday sermon and closing message for a denominational mission conference. My presentation’s title was The Cost of Evangelism: Its time to leave our comfort zones. (If the Lord so leads, I would be greatly blessed in assisting you in evangelism training for your church, if only to address your congregation via my presentation and sharing my evangelism experiences to get the ‘ball rolling.’ Feel free to contact me at: 4Lane.davis@gmail.com)

In my presentation, I used the definition of evangelism offered by Norman and David Geisler in their excellent book, Conversational Evangelism-how to listen and speak so you can be heard. Their definition of evangelism is:

“Evangelism is every day, and in every way, helping your nonbelieving friends to take one step closer to Jesus Christ.”

 
They follow their definition with the following emphasis:

“This means in practice that every day we need to ask ourselves, “What do I need to do today to help my nonbelieving friends take one step closer to Jesus?”

 
Building on the Geislers’ definition of evangelism, I presented the scriptural position that evangelism is a lifestyle, not just a one time experience, or something that we as Christians engage in on special occasions. Throughout my presentation I interjected my personal witnessing experiences in a variety of settings (at my job/workplace, when sitting at a coffee shop, when conversing with my neighbors, etc.) in order to illustrate how ‘sharing the Gospel’ opportunities are there “every day” if the follower of Christ is intentional, equipped and looking for such opportunities. My emphasis was that evangelism isn’t just one part of our calling, it is central to our calling. Jesus’ last words should be our first priority, (Acts 1:8), as should His first words in Matthew’s Gospel when calling His disciples, “Follow me and I will make you become fishers of men.” (Matt. 4:19)

In regard to our Christian calling, Os Guinness states,

Calling is the truth that God calls us to himself so decisively that everything we are, everything we do, and everything we have is invested with a special devotion, dynamism, and direction lived out as a response to his summons and serviceCalling reminds Christians ceaselessly that, far from having arrived, a Christian is someone who in this life is always on the road as “a follower of Christ” and a follower of “the Way…Calling is not only a matter of being and doing what we are but also of becoming what we are not yet but are called by God to be…nothing short of God’s call can ground and fulfill the truest human desire for purpose. (1)

 
I shared with the audience that God uses the faithfulness of thousands and millions of Christians who would never consider evangelism  their ‘gift’. (Note: there is no gift of evangelism-see 1 Cor. 12–there are however,  evangelists who are called to equip each church member to  evangelize– see Eph. 4:11-12.) That you and I may conclude that we are not gifted for the task of evangelism, but that does not absolve us of the responsibility to obey. It is still our duty. God may unusually anoint a Peter and a Paul, a Dwight L Moody, a Spurgeon, a Billy Graham, but He calls each of us to share the good news. As Jim Donohue so aptly put it,  “Evangelism is not a gift given to some, it’s a command given to all. One of our main callings as followers of Christ is to help others become followers of Christ. Many of us have misfiled evangelism in the spiritual gift drawer when it needs to be filed in the spiritual discipline drawer.”2

As Matthew Henry so succinctly said, “The powerful influences of the Holy Spirit bind the true Christian to his duty.

After introducing the definition of evangelism, I showed the audience the following insightful video clip which highlights the reasons that Christians do not share the Gospel.

Why Christians Don’t Share Their Faith with Others

After viewing the video I made a list of the points mentioned and divided them into three sections:

1) Fear, fear and fear
2) Apathy/complacency/too busy
3) Lack of training

 
I covered points 1 and 2 emphasizing the need to become ‘soul conscience’, that we must realize everyone has a soul and that soul will spend eternity in heaven or hell as Jesus made clear in Luke 16 regarding the fate of the rich man and Lazarus who had died. Every time we come into contact with someone we must be sensitive to the fact that they will spend eternity somewhere, and that soul consciousness will help to remedy apathy and complacency.

As Alexander Maclaren stated, “Tell me the depth of a Christian’s compassion, and I will tell you the measure of their usefulness.”

Norman and David present the ambassador’s challenge to each Christian-“…keep in mind that our struggles in evangelism are not primarily about methodology but about maturity. Do we have a heart for God and do we care about the things God cares about (lost people)? If we have God’s heart, we will do whatever we can to advance His kingdom purposes in every conversation we have with our nonbelieving friends.”

The next portion of the presentation was devoted to the joy of evangelism, highlighting John’s first epistle. After presenting an apologetic regarding the eyewitness testimony of the disciples, John gives the reason for his writing and sharing the Good News, “and we are writing these things so that our joy may be complete. (1 John 1:4) Even if we are enjoying our walk with Christ, our Christian experience is still incomplete until we can share it with another. This is the dynamics of joy and it must complete its circuit in order to be fully realized. The greatest thing we can do to excel in our own walk and joy in the Lord is to be engaged in sharing this joy with others. Os Guinness nothing short of God’s call can ground and fulfill the truest human desire for purpose.

John Piper once said that his Dad was the happiest man he’s ever known. When asking his Dad, “what would you say Dad, in a word, is a key to a life-time of happiness?” His Dad without hesitation said, “Tell somebody about Jesus.”

Point 3 from the above list is what I consider to be of vital importance, that of training each member of the congregation to be an ambassador for Christ (2 Cor. 5:17-20) to their family members, co-workers, fellow-students, neighbors, and those that they meet during their day-to-day activities. Sadly, this training is not happening in the majority of churches in North America, which is borne out in the following statistics:

95% of all Christians have never won a soul to Christ.
80% of all Christians do not consistently witness for Christ.
Less than 2% are involved in the ministry of evangelism.
71% do not give toward the financing of the great Commission.(3)

 
It is a sobering reality that nearly 80% of unchurched people say they would engage in a spiritual or faith conversation, but that only 30% of Christians are actually telling people about Jesus.

I believe strongly that unless a church has an evangelism training program for their congregants, these statistics will not change, especially here in North America. There are so many equipping resources at our disposal that they amount to an ’embarrassment of training riches.’ So why aren’t we using them? (I have included such resources at the end of this article. Also, the list of web sites in the right column of this site’s home page offers the best evangelism resources available.)

I have visited a number of Christian bookstores, both in the U.S. and Canada, and when I ask where their evangelism resource section is I am often met with a blank stare as if evangelism was a foreign concept. At other times I am escorted to a small section in the back of the store where there is a small rack of Gospel tracts. Most of the store is used for displaying coffee mugs, posters, painting, key chains, etc., not to mention the plethora of books (many of which are ‘self-help’ oriented) on strengthening one’s Christian walk, etc. As mentioned above, even if we are enjoying our walk with Christ, our Christian experience is still incomplete until we can share it with another. This is the dynamics of joy and it must complete its circuit in order to be fully realized. The greatest thing we can do to excel in our own walk and joy in the Lord is to be engaged in sharing this joy with others.

I will conclude this article with a quote from Norman and David Geislers’ book, Conversational Evangelism, which in my view embodies the purpose, meaning, duty and calling that each of us as Christians has been given by our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ: “You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you that you should go and bear fruit and that your fruit should abide…” (John 15:16) “For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.” (Luke 19:10)

“In spite of your great trepidation, your friend tells you it will be an experience worth remembering. You ignore your fear and tell yourself you’ll by okay. So you step into the roller coaster and strap yourself down knowing that if you just make it through to the end in one piece, that will be a great success. You may not even entertain the possibility that you will enjoy the ride. The bottom line is to just get through it so you can say that you’ve done it.

In many ways doing evangelism these days can be much like riding a roller coaster. You don’t really want to do it, and you certainly don’t expect to enjoy it. Worst of all, through the ups and downs, you always feel like you end up where you originally began.

But what if evangelism could be different? What if it could be something you do, not only because you have an obligation to do it, but more importantly because you see in very tangible ways how your obedience to Christ can make a difference in the lives of those you care most to reach? What if it can be something you enjoy doing so much that you end up doing it every day for the rest of your life? What if, as a result of learning how to effectively build bridges to the Gospel, you feel more and more compelled to make the most of every encounter with your nonbelieving friends to help them take steps to the cross?

This book is an attempt to make this a possibility in the life of the average Christian who increasingly finds it difficult to witness to those in a post-Christian world. Provided that we have the right framework for what evangelism is and have been equipped to engage people in our contra-Christian culture, we believe that not only can we make progress in our witness to people, but we can even enjoy the ride.”

I highly recommend the book, Conversational Evangelism for small and large study groups. It is one of the best contemporary evangelism training tools on the market. Interactive and engaging. Please avail yourself of it.
For a comprehensive book review of Conversational Evangelism, go here

Why Don’t Christians Witness-by Bobby Conway-One Minute Apologist

Conversational Evangelism-Q & A-by David Geisler

Resources

Mind the Gap Series-Overcoming the Challenges to Evangelism-from Solas Center for Public Christianity-here
Frontlines-Christians Sharing Their Faith at Work-from Solas Center for Public Christianity-here
Want to share the Gospel?-Start with this question-Greg Koukl, here
Asking questions is vital in sharing the Gospel…just ask Greg Koukl-by Lane, here
It’s Time to Get Uncomfortable and Move Out of Our ‘comfort zone’-by Lane, here
How to Talk to a Skeptic, by Don Johnson, here
The Intellectual ‘ostrich’-Pt. 1-‘apologetics isn’t for me’-Really? It’s time to open your Bible-by Lane, here
The Intellectual ‘ostrich’-Pt. 2-Survival to influence…the embarrassment of riches-by Lane, here
The Art of Asking Questions-the best defense is a good offense-by Lane, here
Stand to Reason-Greg Koukl-str.org
Cold Case Christianity-by J. Warner Wallace-coldcasechristianity.com

References
1) Os Guinness, The Call-Finding and Fulfilling the Central Purpose of Your Life, W Publishing Group, 2003, pp. 102, 30, 4
2) Jim Donohue, Is Evangelism a Spiritual Gift?,https://www.sgcpastors.com/blog/is-evangelism-a-spiritual-gift
3) Michael Parrott, Street Level Evangelism, Where is the Space for the Local Evangelist, Acts Evangelism, Spokane, WA, 1993, pp. 9-11.

The DEFEND Apologetics Conference will be held on Jan. 7-11, 2019, at the New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary
3939 Gentilly Blvd. New Orleans, LA 70126

Info for registration here

Conference speakers include:
Abdu Murray
Frank Turek
Gary Habermas
Craig Hazen
and more

A little over two-thousand years ago, Pontius Pilate, the governor of Judaea, asked Jesus, “what is truth?” Sadly, the truth was standing right in front of him, but Pilate did not wait for the answer. Today, many are struggling with the confusion of the post-truth ideology that has engulfed the societies of the West, and they too are asking the question, “what is truth?”

In his new book, Saving Truth-Finding Meaning & Clarity in a Post-Truth World, author and speaker Abdu Murray will most certainly help to answer this question and bring clarity to his readers as he explains just how this ‘post-truth’ era came about and how it has brought us into a Culture of Confusion which is detached from reality and awash in feelings, preferences and relativism.

Murray sets the stage at the beginning of his book:

“Culturally speaking, in the past decade we have found ourselves adrift in a river with no bearings in sight. The cultural river we find ourselves in isn’t narrow. We can barely see the land’s outline. In fact, we departed from it so long ago that we’ve forgotten what solid earth feels like and have begun to question whether the land itself is anchored or afloat. As if to put an exclamation mark on this situation, the Oxford Dictionaries selected “post-truth” as 2016’s Word of the Year. The Oxford Dictionaries annually select a word that captures the culture’s current mood and preoccupations. And post-truth does exactly that. According to Oxford Dictionaries, post-truth means “relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.” Although the word dates back to at least 1992, the usage of post-truth ballooned in 2016 by 2,000 percent.”

“Unlike postmodernism, the post-truth mindset acknowledges objective truth, but subordinates it to preferences. That’s dangerous, as logic and evidence don’t have the same influence over the post-truth mindset that they had over a postmodern. In a post-truth age, if the evidence fits our preferences and opinions, then all is well and good. If it doesn’t, then the evidence is deemed inadmissible or offensive, with offense being a kind of solvent against otherwise sound arguments. To mix metaphors a bit, the post-truth mindset is like bacteria that have mutated to become immune to antibiotics. Where truth and logic could combat postmodern bacteria, they seem powerless to arrest post-truths’ infectiousness.

Post-truth has now blossomed into a Culture of Confusion. Confusion is embraced as a virtue and clarity shunned as a sin. The answers to life’s questions no longer need to correspond to reality. They need only cater to our desires.”

Later, in his chapter, Confusion and the Church: Seductions of a Post-Truth Mindset, Murray offers the following insight on how the post-truth ideology has affected the Church of the West:

Seduction in a Two-Part Harmony: The church has succumbed to post-truth’s soft expression in two seemingly contrary ways. On one hand, Christians have compromised the clarity of Scripture for the sake of acceptance and to avoid conflict. On the other hand, Christians have indulged the cultural practice of vilifying those with whom they disagree. These two seductions seem contradictory, but when they work together, they harmonize in a grisly dirge…

So why do so many people, including Christians, misapply Jesus’ statements as a blanket prohibition against all judgment? There are as many reasons as there are people who do so. One common reason is that Christians want to appear tolerant and likable, especially in a time when tolerance, though woefully misdefined–is a chief virtue. Put plainly, many Christians have bought into what Kinnaman and Lyons call “the new moral code” that people should not criticize someone else’s life choices. Can we see the seduction playing out right before our eyes? The post-truth Culture of Confusion elevates preferences and feeling over facts and truth… Dallas Willard’s apt assessment of the spiritual landscape, in which “most of what Americans do in their religion now is done at the behest of feelings… The quest for pleasure takes over the house of God.” Willard’s indictment is true for some of us all of the time. And it is true for all of us at least some of the time.

The second seduction–that of using the truths of Scripture to bludgeon outsiders–brings a pendular swing of over-correcting our desire to be liked. Too often, Christians conveniently forget the fact that like everyone else, they need a Savior. When Christians forget that, they create an “us versus them” paradigm, leading to Christians hungrily gobbling up and passing along iffy articles about how awful “they” are without a moment’s pause. Worse yet, Christians may make churches so unwelcoming that they repel the very people who could benefit from what Jesus has to offer. Truth is once again sacrificed, but this time at the altar of a self-righteous higher agenda to stand up to “them.” Fair or not, people judge the credibility of a message by the integrity of the messenger. If the gospel message of compassion, forgiveness, and reconciliation is proclaimed by those who seem to have none of those qualities, it’s hard to see how the broader culture’s response can be anything but concomitant dismay and anger.

At the end of his last chapter, The Son through Fog: Clarity’s Hope, Abdu presents the answer to the question, “What is truth?”

Jesus is the river and the land, the fount of living water and the rock of our salvation. He secures humanity’s freedom to be what we were intended to be: sacred beings in relationship with the divine. When we realize that, confusion dissipates like a fog and clarity remains. What is truth? we may ask in a world that elevates personal preference over truth. The answer is Jesus–the truth who is personal. He is the Saving Truth.

 
Blossoming Culture of Confusion–Abdu Murray

More books from Abdu Murray:
Grand Central Question: Answering the Critical Concerns of the Major Worldviews
Apocalypse Later: Why the Gospel of Peace Must Trump the Politics of Prophecy in the Middle East

“Before I can make the case for Christianity, I have to make the case for making the case,” so states J. Warner Wallace in the preface of his new book, Forensic Faith-A Homicide Detective Makes the Case for a More Reasonable, Evidential Christian Faith. And he most certainly succeeds in making the case for making the case. (Wallace defines forensic faith as: Believing in something because of the evidence.) I recently purchased not only the book, but the Forensic Faith Curriculum Kit which includes the book, Forensic Faith, a participants guide, and an 8-episode DVD by J. Warner Wallace, with each episode leading the reader/class participant through an amazing apologetics journey, one that will result (if used and embraced) in a newly empowered Christian case-maker. This study is user friendly and can be used in small or large groups, youth Sunday classes, etc. I highly (and that is understating my exuberance) recommend the Forensic Faith Curriculum Kit to youth pastors, parents and individual Christians who have a desire to take their faith and case-making to the next level. Wallace has put together a tremendous tool, one that will help to stem and reverse the tide of the dwindling number of youth in their church if only it is used and applied. In the book, Wallace states the vital and urgent need for apologetic training if we are to keep our youth and transform them into Christian case-makers who are “always ready to give a defense to anyone who asks them for the reason of the hope that is in them…” (1 Peter 3:15):

When Christians see a crisis, we typically respond passionately. We readily rescue those devastated by natural disasters, feed the hungry, and do our best to meet the needs of the impoverished. We have a history of doing whatever it takes to respond to the real human challenges. Well, there’s another real challenge on the horizon. Christians (especially young Christians) are leaving the church in record numbers. Surveys and polls have been exposing this disturbing trend for many years now:

Most teenagers are incredibly inarticulate about their religious beliefs and practices. They typically cannot defend what they believe.
Young, uniformed believers also reject important Christian claims. Sixty-three percent of teenage Christians don’t believe Jesus is the Son of God; 51 percent don’t believe Jesus rose from the dead; 68 percent don’t believe the Holy Spirit is a real Being.
Between 60 percent and 80 percent of people aged 15-30 will leave the church for at least a season, ad most will never return. Only 33 percent of young, churched Christians said that church will play a part in their lives when they leave home.
When surveyed, the largest segment of young, ex-Christian respondents said they left Christianity because they had intellectual doubt, skepticism, and unanswered questions.

Dr. Craig Keener, author and professor of New Testament studies at Asbury Theological Seminary, offers the following endorsement for this vital tool:

J. Warner Wallace is one of the most engaging writers I’ve ever read: to read him is like hearing him argue a public case. It is tragic that we have such strong evidence supporting Christian faith and yet many church-attending Christians never learn to articulate such evidence for people who–like me in my atheist days–desperately needed to hear it. More tragic still are young minds swayed by the mere assertions of Christianity’s often grossly misinformed, uncritical yet self-assured critics. Wallace’s case for making a case offers a desperately needed correction to a church culture too negligent about articulating truth.

 
I believe that the following challenge from Wallace is one that we as the Church need to meet head on by embracing a forensic, evidential faith that will strengthen us as believers, will energize and help keep our youth, empower us to “give a reason for the hope that is in us,” and thereby be effective case-makers when presenting the Christian worldview, and as such, make the impact that Christ intended us to make by being the “salt & light” of the world:

Shouldn’t we, as Christians, be the one group who knows why our beliefs are true and is most willing to defend what we believe? Why, then, are we often uninterested in the evidence? Why do we sound like every other religious group when asked to give a reason for our beliefs? It’s time for the distinctly evidential nature of Christianity to result in a distinctly intelligent, reasonable, and evidential family of believers. This Christian difference ought to form our Christian duty. We are called to embrace a forensic faith and to love God with our minds. Police officers are called to serve and to protect. You don’t enter this profession unless this mission is part of your DNA. Officers understand their sworn duty, train rigorously in preparation for their mission, and lean how to investigate and discern the truth so they can ultimately communicate this truth to a jury. Every day is a call to action.
As a church, we can learn something from this resolute approach to mission. As Christians, we have a similar duty. The apostle Peter said we are called to serve one another with “sympathy, brotherly love, a tender heart, and a humble mind” (1 Peter 3:8 ESV) and called to protect the truth by “being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason of the hope that is in you” (verse 16 ESV). Christians are called to serve and protect. If we want to fulfill this duty, we’ll need to train rigorously so we can investigate and communicate the truth. I hope Forensic Faith is your call to action. It’s time to change course. It’s time to raise the bar. It’s time to get serious. It’s time to embrace our distinct duty as Christians.

 
In the Forward to Forensic Faith, John Stonestreet offers the following challenge to the Church in realigning their position as to the role that apologetics must play if we as Christians are to present a reasonable, rational and robust case when presenting the Christian worldview:

To loosely paraphrase the late Mark Twain, “The news of the demise of apologetics has been greatly exaggerated.” For decades now, skeptics who prematurely proclaim their beliefs as “settled science” have been assisted by Christians who prematurely proclaim apologetics–the practice of presenting arguments for the Christian worldview and against non-Christian worldviews–no longer helpful, if it ever was in the first place. They couldn’t be more wrong. It certainly sounds spiritual to say things like, “Arguments never saved anyone,” or, “No one is ever argued into the kingdom.” Such cliches are, however, silly straw men. I don’t know a single apologist who things of their arguments as salvific. Perhaps there are one or two who do, but I’ve never met them. More importantly, however, such statements display a misunderstanding of who we are as people. Certainly, faith involves more than our brains, but it does not involve less.–John Stonestreet, president of the Colson Center for Christian Worldview.

“When religion is handed down among us by hereditary succession, it is not surprising to find youth of sense and spirit beginning to question the truth of the system in which they were brought up. And it is not surprising to see them abandon a position which they are unable to defend.”– William Wilberforce

Other articles regarding the importance of developing a forensic, evidential faith:

Apologetics & Evangelism-oil & water, or peaches & cream?-by Lane
The intellectual ‘ostrich’-Pt.1 ‘apologetics isn’t for me’ Really?! It’s time to open your Bible-by Lane
The Intellectual ‘ostrich’ Pt. 2-Survival to influence-the embarrassment of riches-by Lane

(Forensic Faith is the third book of a trilogy-for the first book, Cold-case Christianity, and second book, God’s Crime Scene: A Cold-Case Detective Examines the Evidence for a Divinely Created Universe, click on the titles to be directed to Amazon.com. I highly recommend J. Warner Wallace’s site-coldcasechristianity.com–it is a valuable resource for every Christian case-maker.)

Forensic Faith Preview-J. Warner Wallace

What is a forensic faith?-J. Warner Wallace

The Importance of Developing a Forensic Faith-J. Warner Wallace

I recently participated in a multi-faith symposium on the topic of fasting. (For my presentation of the Christian position on fasting, here) After the presentations there was a Q & A with the presenters taking questions from the audience. One of the questions was, “What do you think is the answer to bringing peace to the world?”

The imam’s response/solution to the problem of violence, unrest, man’s inhumanity to man, was that of promoting dialogue between religious faiths, similar to the one we were participating in that evening. Through such dialogue, the world would be brought to a peaceful existence.

The rabbi’s response was similar, that through our own human efforts of showing love and respect to one another we would find peace at the end of the road.

Although I agree in part with both the imam and rabbi regarding the positive effects of loving and respecting one another and the need for dialogue, history has shown that on their own these measures have proven to fall demonstrably short of bringing a solution to the conflict in the world, whether it be between countries, religions, families, etc. One need only look back on the millennia of mankind trying to achieve peace through dialogue, peace treaties (most of which were ultimately broken), UN resolutions [1], etc., which, although well meaning, have failed, hence, the ongoing global violence and conflict that prompted the original question. The reason that these types of approaches have failed, and continue to fail, is that they fail to address the root of the problem–the brokenness of the human heart. As former U.S. President Herbert Hoover so aptly put it, “Peace is not made at the council table or by treaties, but in the hearts of men.” It was for this reason that when the microphone was passed to me I presented a different approach and answer to the question.

I began by stating that although these initiatives were good and needed, they will not bring a lasting solution to the problem; only a regenerated, transformed heart will do that, and that can only come through the Prince of peace, Jesus Christ himself. I then went on to highlight the root of the problem—the broken condition of the heart of man. I quoted several references from the New Testament beginning with James 4:1-3:

What causes quarrels and what causes fights among you? Is it not this; that your passions are at war within you? You desire and do not have, so you murder. You covet and cannot obtain, so you fight and quarrel. You do not have, because you do not ask. You ask and do not receive, because you ask wrongly, to spend it on your passions.

 
Then to Jesus’ expose of the condition of the human heart from Mark 7:20-23:

And he said, “What comes out of a person is what defiles him. For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, coveting, wickedness, deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride, foolishness. All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.”

 
Because of time constraints, I concluded my response by stating the Christian worldview’s solution to the problem-the transformation of the heart that Jesus promised to bring to those who truly desire it.

When addressing the issue of peace, John Paul ll makes a clear affirmation as to where peace must first be founded:

“Peace is a value and a universal duty founded on a rational and moral order of society that has its roots in God himself, “the first source of being, the essential truth and the supreme good” … To prevent conflicts and violence, it is absolutely necessary that peace begin to take root as a value rooted deep within the heart of every person. In this way it can spread to families and to the different associations within society until the whole of the political community is involved. Peace is, consequently, the fruit of that harmony structured into human society by its Divine Founder.”[2]

 
Preeminent missiologist, Frank Ellinwood, explains the uniqueness of the inner transformation of the Christian faith:

Christianity, then, is not a record, a history of what was said and done eighteen centuries ago: it is not a body of doctrines and precepts: it is the living power of God in the soul of man. The written Word is the sword of this Divine Spirit. The renewed soul is begotten of the Spirit and it is instinct with the indwelling of the Spirit. No other system makes any claim to such an influence as that of the Holy Ghost…The dead heart must be quickened and renewed and only Christianity reveals the Transforming Power.[3]

 
In His conversation with one of the religious leaders of His day, Jesus gave the ‘blueprint’ for the transformation of the human heart:

Jesus answered him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.” Nicodemus said to him, “How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother’s womb and be born?” Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God…For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. (John 3:1-5; 16-17)

 
As the ‘salt and light’ of the world, which Jesus has called each of His followers to be, we must continue to present with all boldness where true and lasting peace can be found, that of a ‘born again’ and transformed heart through the redemptive work of the person of Jesus Christ. In doing so, we will be witnesses of the ‘way, the truth and the life,’ and thereby bring peace to the hearts and lives of those to whom we are ambassadors for Christ (John 14:6; 2 Cor. 5:20). (For more on the Christian calling as ‘salt & light’, here)

References
[1] Can the UN Bring Peace to the World, here
[2] Pope John Paul ll, World Day of Peace Message, 1990
[3] Frank F. Ellinwood, The Divine Supremacy of the Christian Faith, here

The following talk from Andy Bannister succinctly highlights the source of the world’s ills as well as the remedy-that of the inner transformation that only Jesus can bring.

Does Religion Poison Everything–Andy Bannister